Malaguzzi, Aristotle and Dewey on the task of early-years moral education

Höfundar

  • Kristján Kristjánsson University of Birmingham

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:

https://doi.org/10.24270/tuuom.2024.33.2

Lykilorð:

Malaguzzi, Aristotle, Dewey, Early-years moral education, synthesis

Útdráttur

Paying homage to one of Dr. Guðrún Alda Harðardóttir’s academic gurus, Loris Malaguzzi, this chapter compares and contrasts the views of Malaguzzi on early-years moral education with those of two of his own academic influencers, Aristotle and John Dewey. Regarding education at the preschool level, all three thinkers turn out to have strengths and weaknesses when it comes to this particular topic and developmental level. It is suggested that the key to drawing serviceable lessons from those disparate authors may lie in aspiring to some sort of synthesis of their views, which retains the strengths but ameliorates the weaknesses. More precisely, Malaguzzi is shown to be strong on two components that Aristotle and Dewey are weak on, respectively: moral-education methodology and moral motivation.

Um höfund (biography)

Kristján Kristjánsson, University of Birmingham

Kristján Kristjánsson (k.kristjansson@bham.ac.uk) PhD in Philosophy from the University of St. Andrews, 1990, is a Professor of Character Education and Virtue Ethics, University of Birmingham and also holds a fractional position in the School of Education, University of Iceland. He works on the borderline between moral philosophy, moral psychology and moral education, and has published various works in those areas. He is the editor of Journal of Moral Education

Niðurhal

Útgefið

2024-10-30

Tölublað

Kafli

Ritrýndar greinar

Mest lesnu greinar eftir sama höfund(a)